On 11.04.2019 Ivo Leito gives a presentation titled “How to make maximum use of the available pKa data in non-aqueous solvents?” at 26th Croatian Meeting of Chemists and Chemical Engineers (26HSKIKI), in Šibenik (Croatia). The presentation discusses the principles of acid-base behaviour in solvents and on how to estimate the pKa values of compounds in solvents where direct experimental data are not available.
During 24-26.02.2019 the Suprachem 2019 conference took place at University of Würzburg (Germany). The UT Analytical chemistry chair was represented by two posters: Optimization of the reaction pathway for the synthesis of substituted 1,3-bis(carbazolyl)urea anion receptors by Alo Rüütel and Mihkel Ilisson and From receptor-anion binding ladder to ion-selective electrode by Kerli Martin, Sandip A. Kadam, Ulriika Mattinen, Johan Bobacka and Ivo Leito.
The presentation from Alo and Mihkel focused on optimization of the synthesis route of anion receptors (ionophores) based on the 1,3-bis(carbazolyl)urea building block, augmented with additional amide functionalities (see the poster). The developed synthesis route is very valuable for the synthesis of a wide variety of analogous receptors (ionophores) that have previously been demonstrated to bind carboxylates with high affinity (see K. Martin et al, Eur. J. Org. chem. 2017, 5231-5237).
Kerli Martin et al present the first practical application of such receptors: a solid-contact acetate-selective electrodes. For acetate anion the electrodes show linearity over the activity range of 10-4.50 – 10-1.10 with a sub-Nernstian slope of -51.3 mV per decade and a detection limit of 10-5.00. The anion-selectivity pattern of these electrodes deviates markedly from the pattern found in DMSO solution and from the Hofmeister pattern. The selectivity coefficients of SCN–, I–, NO3– and Br– decrease by 3-5 orders of magnitude when adding the studied ionophore to the membrane. The selectivity coefficients of hydrophilic anions such as Cl–, F–, HPO42–, and SO42– are significantly lower than in case of the ionophore-free control membrane. All in all, it is clear that a lot of work is still needed for improving the selectivity of the electrode.
This work has been accepted for publication: K. Martin et al Electroanalysis 2019 (the link will work soon).
The combined contributions from our group stood out from the majority (the conference altogether had 27 oral and 111 poster presentations) by a clear line of development from fundamental research (receptor design) to highly practical application (ion-selective electrode).
(Photos: above left: Mihkel Ilisson explaining his work to Dr Diane Smith from Wiley; right: Poster by Kerli Martin et al)
Our group is proud to be the leading organiser of the 2019 Eurachem General Assembly and the accompanying scientific workshop “Validation of targeted and non-targeted methods of analysis”!
The Workshop will take place in Tartu (Dorpat conference centre) on May 20th and 21st. The programme of the workshop, as well as registration and abstract submission are available at the event website:
https://eurachem2019.akki.ut.ee/
The workshop addresses the current status of analytical method validation in general and specifically validation of the non-targeted methods (i.e. ones where the analyte is not defined beforehand). Non-targeted methods are an especially noteworthy part of the workshop programme, because their validation involves specific issues (since analyte is not known it is not possible to make validation experiments with it) and is significantly less developed than validation of targeted methods (i.e. the “normal” analytical methods, where the analyte is known beforehand). At the same time non-targeted methods are becoming increasingly important in environmental protection, food safety, different omics areas, etc.
Some example topics of the workshop are: Validation of targeted methods: where are we? Validation of non-targeted methods – differences from targeted methods. Detection of a multitude of (unknown) components in complex samples: criteria for identification. Managing the huge amounts of complex data from non-targeted methods. Software solutions for validation.
Compact overview of the workshop can be found in the 2nd circular.
These events mark the 30th anniversary of Eurachem and are jointly organized by Eurachem and ECAC (University of Tartu, Tallinn University of Technology and the Estonian Environmental Research Centre).
We are hoping to see many of you in Tartu in May!
13th biennial conference of Infrared & Raman User Group, shortly IRUG, was for the first time ever held in Sydney, Australia in a beautiful Art Gallery of New South Wales. IRUG conferences are gathering people using IR and Raman spectroscopy for the analysis of cultural heritage, architecture, and forensic materials. This year 101 people were attending, including Dr Signe Vahur and PhD student Pilleriin Peets from our group. Pilleriin was also introducing her results in analyzing textile fibres with IR spectroscopy in an oral presentation. Development of methods for the analysis of various textiles using ATR- and reflectance FT-IR spectroscopy turned out to be very relevant: throughout all three days, many people approached to discuss the topic, ask questions and advice or to make contacts for later cooperation. We were also very glad that conference participants were interested in our ATR-FT-IR spectral database of cultural heritage and conservation materials, available here.
Three days were filled with a wide range of interesting presentations from analysis of Aboriginal Australian pigments and identification of contents from the coffin of a 2500-year-old Egyptian mummy Mer-Neith-it-es to investigations of cultural heritage materials using neutron techniques. Besides the analysis of traditional pigments, organic pigments, especially synthetic organic pigments and their use in art were discussed (oral presentation by Dr Suzanne Lomax and Dr Steven Saverwyns). Another very interesting and thought-provoking presentation was done by Dr Gregory Smith from Indianapolis Museum of Art. He discussed the difficulties in getting accurate standard reference materials in the field of cultural heritage analysis. His results showing how many false materials can be found on the market (and not only vendors like Kremer Pigmente, but also providers like Sigma Aldrich) were very surprising.
All in all, IRUG 13 conference offered three full days of interesting presentations, a lot of knowledge and useful tips for further research and a pleasant atmosphere with excellent company.
On Dec 3, 2018, Ivo Leito gave a presentation at the Sample Treatment 2018 conference (Caparica, Portugal) about the Excellence in Analytical Chemistry (EACH) Erasmus Mundus master’s programme that is coordinated by our group.
The focus of the talk was sample preparation and how is it included in the EACH programme. A key feature of the presentation was a question to the participants as for what else could/should the EACH programme contain in terms of sample preparation, especially keeping in mind emerging techniques. Another one was a call to come to teach at EACH as visiting scholar. During the subsequent coffee breaks a number of people approached Ivo and interesting ideas were proposed as to what to include into the programme’s set of covered sample preparation approaches (dialysis, different microextraction techniques, sonication, etc). Several people also expressed interest to contribute to the programme as visiting scholars.
Call of applications to the EACH visiting scholar scheme is constantly open at the EACH Visiting scholars page and submitting of application is non-binding, so it is encouraged also if you are not yet sure whether you will come.
We are thankful to all participants for their feedback and ideas!
On Nov 05, 2018 Ivo Leito gave a presentation Unified pH about the pan-European research network of fundamental pH Research UnipHied (www.uniphied.eu) at the 7th Baltic Electrochemistry Conference organized by the University of Tartu.
The presentation started with explaining the need for the experimental realization and measurement capability of unified pH (pHabs). Thereafter the current state of art of measuring pHabs values was described and finally, some first exemplary results were highlighted.
The presentation created a lot of interest from the participants and roughly as many questions were asked as for the other four presentations of the same session put together!
As of now, it is not possible to compare pH values of solutions made in different solvents, as every solvent has its own pH scale. This situation is highly unfortunate, since it causes confusion and inaccuracies into many fields, extending far beyond the specific field of acid-base chemistry. Examples are industrial catalytic processes, food chemistry, liquid chromatography, etc.
The central aim of the UnipHied network is to establish at international level measurement capability of pHabs values that would be applicable also at routine laboratory level. The two key activities for achieving that are creating a reliable method for the experimental or computational evaluation of the liquid junction potential and between aqueous and non-aqueous solutions and developing a coherent and validated suite of calibration standards for standardizing routine measurement systems in terms of pHabs values for a variety of widespread systems (e.g., industrial mixtures, soils/waters, food products, biomaterials).
The partners of the UnipHied network are LNE (France, coordinator), BFKH (Hungary), CMI (Czech Republic), DFM (Denmark), IPQ (Portugal), PTB (Germany), SYKE (Finland), TÜBITAK-UME (Turkey), Freiburg University (Germany), ANBSensors (United Kingdom), FCiencias.ID (Portugal), UT (Estonia, initiator).
UnipHied is funded from the EMPIR programme (project 17FUN09) co-financed by the Participating States and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme.
On Oct 26, 2018, Ivo Leito gave a presentation titled “Analytical chemistry education activities at University of Tartu” at the EcoBalt 2018 conference in Vilnius, Lithuania.
The presentation contains information about the online courses LC-MS Method Validation and Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis, as well as the recently published tutorial reviews (Validation I, Validation II, LoD I, LoD II) that form the basis of the LC-MS Method Validation course.
The presentation also addresses the international master’s programmes Applied Measurement Science and Excellence in Analytical Chemistry at the University of Tartu.
The last part of the talk is devoted to the Eurachem 2018 General Assembly and Workshop that will take place in Tartu on May 20-21, 2018. The topic of the workshop is “Validation of targeted and non-targeted methods of analysis”.
From the 9th to the 13th of September MSACL EU 2018 Annual Congress took place in the cosy city of Salzburg, Austria. This conference was designed to mass spectrometry audience mainly focusing on clinical applications. I had the opportunity to participate in this inspiring conference. Moreover, I had the possibility to give a talk. I introduced our studies on standard substance free quantitation in LC/ESI/MS analysis.
Prof. Jerzy Adamski kicked off the conference with the plenary lecture on the topic “Metabolomics Messages on Human Health and Diseases”. As one of the main goals of this conference is to inspire and encourage the young scientists the next session was lightning talks. Poster presenters had 90 seconds and one slide to present their research and cultivate interest in their topic. Additional possibility to get to know mature scientist was the program “meet the experts”. There were short meetings as well as booth and poster tours with experts. I had the possibility to analyze some posters together with Dr. Oleg Mayboroda from Leiden University Medical Centre. It was nice to see how the experts look at the posters and how and which questions they ask. Dr. Mayboroda gave a checklist of how to assess the goodness of the PCA plot presented on posters.
There were 5 parallel sessions every day. For me, the three highlights were as follows. First of all, Dr. Mario Thevis gave a talk about mass spectrometry in sports drug testing. Also, Prof. David Millington gave an interesting talk about the role of tandem mass spectrometry in newborn screening. It was encouraging to see how the methods developed by his team save around 2500 newborns on yearly basis. Furthermore, Dr. Lyudmilla Yanshole gave a talk about using postmortem tissues for biomarker identification. It is an interesting study as for lots of diseases it is very difficult to get tissue of healthy species.
I had the possibility to present for the first time a talk at an international conference. For that, I am most grateful for the MSACL organization and the scientific committee. I introduced the recent results on the feasibility of standard substance free (semi)quantitation in LC/ESI/MS using ionization efficiency prediction models. We have measured more than 2000 ionization efficiency values. We have incorporated 21 solvent compositions. The models are developed based on descriptors calculated from the 2D structure of compounds and the predictions perform well even in complex matrices, namely, bodily fluids. Our average misprediction of ionization efficiencies is less than 3.5 times mismatch. I thank the audience for fruitful discussions on the topic.
Salzburg is a lovely city with stunning views of the Alps. Furthermore, the organizer made our stay at the conference very enjoyable with the nice coffee breaks and warm buffet for lunch and dinner which were offered every day.
From 26 to 31 of August Florence hosted a vast majority of mass spectrometry scientist in the course of 22nd International Mass Spectrometry Conference. Among these were also our group members researchers Anneli Kruve and Riin Rebane, PhD students Piia Liigand and Jaanus Liigand, MSc student Mari Ojakivi and a visiting PhD student Tingting Wang from the Technical University of Denmark. We had a chance to present altogether 5 posters at the conference. Our posters can be found here. As is the case for IMSC, the topics ranged as wide as it can be for mass spec and always there was something to see and hear. We were happy to see that there was a lot of interest in our work. Congratulations to Anneli, whose poster received Chemistry – A European journal poster award! The conference was accompanied by delicious Italian food and nice warm weather. We enjoyed every second of this highly intensive week and are looking forward to IMSC 2020 in Rio.
Anneli Kruve: It is no secret that I am very keen on non-target screening methods, so I really enjoyed all the talks and posters regarding non-target screening and compound identification. My favorite talk was actually also in the field of compound identification given by Prof. Rober Mistrik in the Thermo lunch seminar. He very nicely explained the Precursor Ion Fingerprinting strategy and explained some of the new tips and tricks which are now combined in the Mass Frontier 8.0. It also very strongly resonated with the perspective I recently wrote about semi-quantitative non-target screening. I also have to mention the plenary lecture by Prof. Marco Leona from Metropolitan Museum of Art, who did not focus specifically on mass spec but gave us a really nice overview of scientific research of art. I constantly kept thinking how beautiful it is to have a background in chemistry: one can, virtually, combine all interest and make a great new whole. Prof. Leona, for example, was combining beautiful artworks, history of humankind, the biology of colorful bugs and plants, and on top of that mass spectrometry. And I definitely also felt honored to receive my best poster prize awarded by Chemistry – A European Journal!
Riin Rebane: It was my first experience of Florence as well as IMSC and when the first one greeted with wonderful food, the second one gave food for thought. It was a thorough overview of the latest advances in mass spectrometry and an insight into different works of scientists from academia as well as industry, therefore, it was certainly a challenge to grasp it all. But despite that, it was also nice to see that sessions towards practical applications of mass spectrometry in for example food or environmental analysis, were so popular that arriving late meant that all seats were already taken by other enthusiasts.
Mari Ojakivi: IMSC 2018 was the first scientific conference that I attended and as a master’s student it was an eye-opening experience. It was very nice to see so many scientists introducing their brilliant work with a mass spec. Seeing all the different applications in forensics, food and environmental science, as well as fundamental research in all the -omics fields made me understand how powerful tool mass spectrometry is. What is more, presenting my own work and seeing other scientists being so interested in it, verified that I am doing good and important science.
Piia Liigand: I thoroughly enjoyed the IMSC 2018 in Florence. It was a nice opportunity to meet and talk to scientists from all over the world. I was also very positively surprised to see so much interest in my poster and I truly enjoyed the discussions I had while presenting my poster. Thanks to these discussions I now have even more understanding of the importance of the science we do and what to do next. I also enjoyed meeting friends from past conferences and catching up on their research in more detail. Of course, the food, wine and general ambiance of Florence was an excellent environment to do all that.
Jaanus Liigand: I enjoyed the IMSC 2018 in Florence as it offered a very wide set of different interesting topics of mass spectrometry field. The inspiring presentations, fruitful discussions, interdisciplinary ideas, and excellent community made it a very enjoyable conference. My favorite session was environmental MS where Prof. Susan Richardson gave in her keynote a very nice overview of the recent developments in this field followed by interesting presentations. Additionally, I enjoyed meeting friends from previous conferences and discussing their and our research. Of course, the historical city – Florence – with the food and wine scenery made the week even more enjoyable.
Tingting Wang: It was a really memorable experience to participate IMSC in Florence, and I enjoyed the atmosphere and all the academic events there. It’s so impressive how wide are the application fields that mass spectrometry can do in the world by looking through a thousand posters. It’s hard to say which presentation or poster was my favorite, but I do pay more attention to the non-target screening strategy applied in food control, environmental, metabolomics, and proteomics study, especially the workshop on the second day about non-target analysis. It was interesting and very informative because unknown screening by high-resolution mass spectrometry is the topic of my PhD project, how to combine target and non-target screening, how to develop a more precise identification and quantification strategy for the non-target even unknowns, and how to prioritize unknowns are the problems I am always facing. It is nice that I could see these similar studies with various workflows from other researchers, and have the chance to listen to their presentations and even talk with those people to get inspiration for my research.
On the 20th -23rd of August 2018 Eliise, Pilleriin and Markus, who regularly use the FT-ICR-MS as part of their research, attended the first EU FT-ICR MS End User School. The school was organized by professor Janne Jänis and took place in the University of Eastern Finland in Joensuu. The school is part of the efforts of the European Network of Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry Centres (www.eu-fticr-ms.eu, the materials and slides from the course will also be available on this website under the documents section in the near future) to establish an EU community of end-users and FT-ICR-MS scientists. The objective of this network is to promote and provide resources for the wider application of FT-ICR-MS instruments by European academic, industrial and business institutions. The school was intended for researchers and students who are still relatively new to the machine.
The school consisted mostly of lectures by some of the world’s leading experts on FT-ICR MS. A few examples include prof. Peter O’Connor covering the fundamentals of FT-ICR-MS along with sharing some guidelines to follow in order to get the most out of one’s ICR and Evgeny Nikolaev talking about the dynamically harmonized ICR cell which he invented. In general, many different topics were covered: data acquisition and signal processing, isotopic fine structure and quadrupolar detection, atmospheric pressure ion sources, various applications of the machine etc.
Every day after the lectures some time was given for the attendees to present short talks covering their own research. The students also had the opportunity to present posters which could be viewed during the breaks between lectures. There was a 200€ prize for the best poster which was won by Anika Neuman for her work concerning the comparison of APCI and photoionization for gas analysis with FT-ICR-MS.
On the 21st of August the organizers gave a short tour of the universities FT-ICR-MS lab where they showed their 12 Tesla Bruker APEX-Qe instrument.
The summer school also included a half-day trip to the nearby Valamo monastery and whiskey distillery where a short excursion was accompanied with a wine tasting session and lunch.
All in all the summer school proved to be very beneficial to the attendees as along with gathering several new ideas regarding the most efficient use of the machine, many contacts were established with experts in the field.
